Comments on draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-10

[Wil Tan]

Yes. And allowing capital ASCII letters in U-labels would work. By doing so,
is there any possibility for regression in other parts of the protocol?
=wil

2009/8/31 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>

>
> On 31 aug 2009, at 07.05, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>
>  So, casefold of the ascii in the A-label only result in casefold of
>> the ascii in the U-label.
>>
>
> Ok, after a gulp of coffee, I see your point.
>
> In the tables document we have the following:
>
>  2.5. LDH (E) E:
>>
>>    cp is in {002D, 0030..0039, 0061..007A}
>>
>
> That make for example 'F' illegal in an U-label.
>
> By changing this rule to the following, uppercase ASCII would be ok to have
> in an U-label.
>
> 2.5. LDH (E) E:
>
>    cp is in {002D, 0030..0039, 0041..005A, 0061..007A}
>
>
>   paf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090831/1a4c4fd8/attachment.htm