Comments on draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-10

[Patrik Fältström]

On 31 aug 2009, at 07.05, Patrik Fältström wrote:

> So, casefold of the ascii in the A-label only result in casefold of
> the ascii in the U-label.

Ok, after a gulp of coffee, I see your point.

In the tables document we have the following:

> 2.5. LDH (E) E:
>
>     cp is in {002D, 0030..0039, 0061..007A}

That make for example 'F' illegal in an U-label.

By changing this rule to the following, uppercase ASCII would be ok to  
have in an U-label.

2.5. LDH (E) E:

     cp is in {002D, 0030..0039, 0041..005A, 0061..007A}


    paf

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090831/c2712e5c/attachment.pgp