Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-10

[Paul Hoffman]

At 12:31 AM -0400 8/23/09, Vint Cerf wrote:
>i think we still need the figure - john suggested moving the footnotes 
>into the text to appear before the figure.

You may be mixing up two figures here. I fully agree we need Figure 1; my question about needing the figure was only about Figure 2.

>On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> > Anchor 10 above Figure 1 indicates that the figure might be shrunk. 
> > I propose instead that the four footnotes simply be moved to 
> > immediately after the figure, which makes the figure itself fit on 
> > one page.
>>
>> In Figure 2, the terms "Binary Label (including high bit on)" and 
>> "Bit String Label" are not defined and are confusing without 
> > definition. Do we need this figure at all any more?