Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-10
Vint Cerf
vint at google.com
Sun Aug 23 06:31:54 CEST 2009
i think we still need the figure - john suggested moving the footnotes
into the text to appear before the figure.
vint
On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Anchor 10 above Figure 1 indicates that the figure might be shrunk.
> I propose instead that the four footnotes simply be moved to
> immediately after the figure, which makes the figure itself fit on
> one page.
>
> In Figure 2, the terms "Binary Label (including high bit on)" and
> "Bit String Label" are not defined and are confusing without
> definition. Do we need this figure at all any more?
>
>
> Editorial:
>
> . . .
> labels. They are called FAKE A-Labels for convenience.
> s/FAKE A-Labels/"FAKE A-Labels/ (to be parallel with other
> definitions)
> . . .
> | | | ("??--") or R-LDH LABELS | ______________
> | |
> | | | | |NON-RESERVED |
> | |
> | | | ------------------------------- | | LDH LABELS |
> | |
> | | | | XN LABELS | | | (NR-LDH- |
> | |
> | | | | _____________ ___________ | | | labels) |
> | |
> | | | | | | | || | |NR-LDH LABELS|
> | |
> The second "NR-LDH LABELS" should be removed.
> . . .
> | | ----------------------
> | |
> | | | Underscore labels |
> | |
> | | | e.g. _tcp |
> | |
> | | |--------------------|
> | |
> | | | leading |
> | |
> s/leading/Labels with leading/
> | | | or trailing |
> | |
> | | | hyphens "-abcd" |
> | |
> | | | or "xyz-" |
> | |
> | | | or "-uvw-" |
> | |
> | | |--------------------|
> | |
> | | | Other non-LDH |
> | |
> s/Other non-LDH/Labels with other non-LDH/
> | | | ASCII chars |
> | |
> | | | e.g. #$%_ |
> | |
> . . .
> (1) ASCII letters (upper and lower case), digits,
> hyphen. Hyphen may not appear in first or last
> position. Less than 63 characters.
> s/Less than 63 characters./63 characters or fewer./
> . . .
> . . .
> For IDNA-aware applications, valid labels include "A-labels",
> s/valid labels include/the three types of valid labels are/
> "U-labels", and "NR-LDH-labels", each of which is defined below.
> The
> . . .
> Unvalidated A-labels are known only to be XN Labels, while Fake
> s/XN Labels/XN-Labels/ (this form is used in other places)
> A-labels have been demonstrated to fail some of the A-label tests.
> . . .
> is permitted in those contexts. If only A-labels are used,
> differences in interpretation between IDNA2003 and this version
> arise
> only for characters whose interpretation have actually changed
> (e.g.,
> characters, such as ZWJ and ZWNJ, that were mapped to nothing in
> IDNA2003 and that are considered legitimate by these
> specifications).
> s/legitimate/legitimate in some circumstances/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list