KATS (Korean Agency for Technology and Standards)'s Comments on theUnicode Codepoints and IDNA Internet-Draft
Dae Hyuk Ahn
dhahn at microsoft.com
Fri Oct 31 15:32:02 CET 2008
I have exactly same opinion with John and Michael.
Thanks,
Dae Hyuk Ahn. Ph.D.
On 08. 10. 31 오후 11:26, "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
On 31 Oct 2008, at 14:06, John C Klensin wrote:
> Finally, while we associated terms like "phishing" with our "leave
> it to the registries" principle, I believe that the Korean case for
> exclusion of Jamo has been clearly made and that we should not
> attempt to fault (or punish) the rather considerable effort that has
> been made here because they didn't understand the idiosyncrasies of
> the vocabulary used in the WG.
I also believe that a case for exclusion of Jamo has been clearly made.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
_______________________________________________
Idna-update mailing list
Idna-update at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20081031/5743b54a/attachment.htm
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list