<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: KATS (Korean Agency for Technology and Standards)'s Comments on theUnicode Codepoints and IDNA Internet-Draft</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>I have exactly same opinion with John and Michael.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks, <BR>
Dae Hyuk Ahn. Ph.D.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 08. 10. 31 ¿ÀÈÄ 11:26, "Michael Everson" <<a href="everson@evertype.com">everson@evertype.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>On 31 Oct 2008, at 14:06, John C Klensin wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> Finally, while we associated terms like "phishing" with our "leave<BR>
> it to the registries" principle, I believe that the Korean case for<BR>
> exclusion of Jamo has been clearly made and that we should not<BR>
> attempt to fault (or punish) the rather considerable effort that has<BR>
> been made here because they didn't understand the idiosyncrasies of<BR>
> the vocabulary used in the WG.<BR>
<BR>
I also believe that a case for exclusion of Jamo has been clearly made.<BR>
<BR>
Michael Everson * <a href="http://www.evertype.com">http://www.evertype.com</a><BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Idna-update mailing list<BR>
<a href="Idna-update@alvestrand.no">Idna-update@alvestrand.no</a><BR>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update</a><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>