Suggestion for rearranging -BIDI

[Mark Davis]

I agree; the actual requirements should come first. (The rest could either
come second or even be moved to Rationale.)
Mark


On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:07, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>wrote:

> I have had a suggestion from one participant to reorder the material in
> -bidi.
>
> He suggests placing the actual rules (section 4) first (after intro),
> followed by the rationale section, the requirements section and the
> caveats/issues sections.
>
> The current layout (intro, rationale, requirements, rules, caveats)
> roughly reflects the thought stream that led to the document. It seemed
> rational to me at the time, but may not seem rational to a reader who
> comes at it out of the blue.
>
> What do other readers think of this?
>
>                    Harald
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20081118/967df813/attachment.htm