Deprecated characters?

Patrik Fältström patrik at frobbit.se
Thu Jul 17 06:26:08 CEST 2008


I see the following proposal from UTC.

Question: Some of the codepoints that either are, or are suggested to  
be, deprecated are PVALID according to the tables document.

Does that create any problems?

    Patrik

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Rick McGowan <rick at unicode.org>
> Date: on 16 jul 2008 23.24.07 GMT+02:00
> To: unicode at unicode.org
> Subject: Two New Public Review Issues: Replacement Characters and  
> Deprecated Characters
>
> The Unicode Technical Committee has posted two new issues for public
> review and comment. Details are on the following web page:
>
> 	http://www.unicode.org/review/
>
> Review periods for the new items close on August 4, 2008.
>
> Please see the above page for links to discussion and relevant  
> documents.
> Briefly, the new issues are:
>
>
> Public Review Issue #121, Recommended Practice for Replacement  
> Characters
>
> The Unicode Technical Committee has been requested to specify what the
> recommended practice is for replacement characters in converting ill- 
> formed
> subsequences. See the review document for further explanation:
> 	http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-121.html
>
>
> Public Review Issue #122, Proposal for Additional Deprecated  
> Characters
>
> The Unicode Technical Committee is considering giving a number of
> additional characters the Deprecated property. For more details, see  
> the
> review document:
> 	http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-122.html
>
>
>
> If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post  
> them by
> submitting your comments through our feedback & reporting page:
>
>    http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html
>
> If you wish to discuss issues on the Unicode mail list, then please
> use the following link to subscribe (if necessary). Please be aware
> that discussion comments on the Unicode mail list are not  
> automatically
> recorded as input to the UTC. You must use the reporting link above
> to generate comments for UTC consideration.
>
>    http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html
>
> Regards,
> 	Rick McGowan
> 	Unicode, Inc.
>
>



More information about the Idna-update mailing list