Reserved general punctuation
phoffman at imc.org
Sun Apr 27 21:01:37 CEST 2008
At 10:21 PM +0100 3/20/08, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>On 20 mar 2008, at 18.30, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>At 10:20 AM -0700 3/20/08, Mark Davis wrote:
>>>No, I'm saying the reverse. The way the 05 logic is set up, the
>>>table contains the lines I quoted:
>>>2064..2069 ; DISALLOWED # <reserved>..<reserved>
>>>I think it should not; that is, that those *should* be:
>>>2064..2069 ; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
>>Got it. Yes, that seems right.
>I just want people to know I have seen this.
Unfortunately, it did not get reflected in your newest draft from
earlier today, which says:
200E..2071 ; DISALLOWED # LEFT-TO-RIGHT MARK..SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL
Maybe the algorithm needs further tweaking for this.
More information about the Idna-update