A comment on draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-05.txt
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Mon Apr 7 08:08:10 CEST 2008
At 09:09 08/04/07, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> o the code points for UCAS, not that I'm particularly fond of the "U" or the "C" part of that, as Dirk's approach does make historic texts in Siksika and Carrier and Cree pre-UCAS orthographies more difficult, but it is a script in use;
>1401..166C ; PVALID # CANADIAN SYLLABICS E..CANADIAN SYLLABICS CAR
>166D..166E ; DISALLOWED # CANADIAN SYLLABICS CHI SIGN..CANADIAN SYLLAB
>166F..1676 ; PVALID # CANADIAN SYLLABICS QAI..CANADIAN SYLLABICS N
At the end of your mail, you say that you are pleased to see various
codepoints valid, but what about the above two disallowed codepoints?
Is it okay to have them disallowed, or should they be allowed? Just
to make sure we get as much things right as possible.
#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
More information about the Idna-update