06FD and 06FE should be PVALID for Sindhi
vint at google.com
Wed Apr 2 05:45:22 CEST 2008
point taken - however I think it also important that there be an
automatic way to capture and utilize the tables in the same sense
that valid TLD tables are going to be important to maintain and to
automate instantiation of "valid TLD" checking software.
On Apr 1, 2008, at 11:08 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 2 apr 2008, at 02.13, John C Klensin wrote:
>>> This leads to an interesting question about maintenance of the
>>> exception tables for IDN200X - it sounds like something that
>>> should end up as an IANA-maintained table. Does that sound
>> I think that has been our general assumption. As usual with IANA-
>> maintained tables these days, the key issue is not who maintains
>> the table but how the decisions to add or alter entries are made.
> To start with, I personally would like to have it as part of the
> tables document, so that RFC action is needed to change it. Having
> the list "too dynamic" would not be fun as I have no idea what the
> real implications will be for interoperability with multiple of
> those in the wild.
More information about the Idna-update