06FD and 06FE should be PVALID for Sindhi

Patrik Fältström patrik at frobbit.se
Wed Apr 2 05:08:37 CEST 2008

On 2 apr 2008, at 02.13, John C Klensin wrote:

>> This leads to an interesting question about maintenance of the
>> exception tables for IDN200X - it sounds like something that
>> should end up as an IANA-maintained table. Does that sound
>> right?
> I think that has been our general assumption.   As usual with IANA- 
> maintained tables these days, the key issue is not who maintains the  
> table but how the decisions to add or alter entries are made.

To start with, I personally would like to have it as part of the  
tables document, so that RFC action is needed to change it. Having the  
list "too dynamic" would not be fun as I have no idea what the real  
implications will be for interoperability with multiple of those in  
the wild.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list