[RTW] New proposed charter text. Please review before the BoF.

[Bernard Aboba]

The intent of item 8 was for the IETF to provide API-related requirements to
the W3C, not for
API-related work to be done in IETF. 

For example, during the discussions on this list there has been discussion
of the need to obtain
IP addresses of interfaces as required by ICE, or the details of codec
support required by 
Jingle or SDP offer/answer.  

-----Original Message-----
From: rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no]
On Behalf Of Philippe Le Hegaret
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:34 PM
To: Ted Hardie
Cc: François Daoust; rtc-web at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: [RTW] New proposed charter text. Please review before the BoF.

On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 09:18 -0700, Ted Hardie wrote:
> 8.     Provide W3C input for the APIs that comes from the
> communication model and the selected components and protocols that are
> part of the solution.

>From a W3C point, I'd like to understand what item 8 means. W3C is
putting in place a working group to develop the APIs.

Will the IETF Group also work on them in order to provide input?

There is certainly a need for coordination between the two groups but
I'm concerned that the IETF Group would work on the APIs...

Regards,

Philippe


_______________________________________________
RTC-Web mailing list
RTC-Web at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web