[RTW] [dispatch] Does RTC-WEB need to pick a signaling protocol?

[Richard Shockey]

Duh ... what are we abandoning 10 years of work?

-----Original Message-----
From: dispatch-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dispatch-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Erik Lagerway
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Rosenberg, Jonathan
Cc: rtc-web at alvestrand.no; DISPATCH list
Subject: Re: [dispatch] [RTW] Does RTC-WEB need to pick a signaling
protocol?

SIP, for various reasons, is the right choice IMO.

My 2 bits outside of dispatch:
http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/rtc-web/2011-January/000312.html

On 2011-01-29, at 8:18 AM, "Rosenberg, Jonathan"
<jonathan.rosenberg at skype.net
 > wrote:

> Absolutely. I agree this debate should be resolved in the group, and
> the
> charter should specify that this question (whether or not we need to
> specify a protocol, and then if so, what it is) is in scope. I send
> some
> proposed text for charter wording along these lines.
>
> Of course, that doesn't mean we cannot start the debate early. And
> indeed,
> since we have, I chimed in ;)
>
> -Jonathan R.
>
> Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.               SkypeID: jdrosen
> Chief Technology Strategist                Mobile: +1 (732) 766-2496
> Skype                                      SkypeIn: +1 (408) 465-0361
> jdrosen at skype.net                          http://www.skype.com
> jdrosen at jdrosen.net                        http://www.jdrosen.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:rtc-web-
> bounces at alvestrand.no]
> On Behalf Of Adam Roach
> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 10:39 AM
> To: Jonathan Rosenberg
> Cc: rtc-web at alvestrand.no; 'DISPATCH list'
> Subject: Re: [RTW] [dispatch] Does RTC-WEB need to pick a signaling
> protocol?
>
> On 1/29/11 8:35 AM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>> I'm starting a separate thread on this, since I don't want to
>> confound
>> it with the charter discussion. This is a topic that should be
>> resolved within the group itself
>
> I have a number of thoughts on this topic also, but I don't think this
> (DISPATCH) is the forum for them. I'd like for these conversations to
> take place, though, so I want it to be clear in the charter that we
> aren't precluded from choosing one path over the other.
>
> Is it fair to characterize your statement that "this is a topic that
> should be resolved within the group itself" to support leaving the
> charter open enough to support any consensus conclusion that
> discussion
> may reach?
>
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> RTC-Web mailing list
> RTC-Web at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web
> _______________________________________________
> RTC-Web mailing list
> RTC-Web at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web
_______________________________________________
dispatch mailing list
dispatch at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch