[RTW] WG charter, take 4

[Harald Alvestrand]

On 02/25/11 16:06, Peter Musgrave wrote:
> +1
>
> (This was a past topic on the list and appeared to have good support as a distinct WG).
I certainly do not support having this as a separate WG, and did not see 
extensive support from others either. YMMV.
> On 2011-02-25, at 10:01 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>
>> It is already obvious that any codec selection for this is going to be a
>> difficult and possibly take time. To avoid this from de-railing the
>> truly fundamental parts of the RTC-WEB solution, I am suggesting that
>> this should be taken in its own WG, or if not possible at least as a
>> separate WG item, with its own deadlines, so that it doesn't hold up
>> the main work.
>