Last Call: 'IETF Problem Statement' to Informational RFC
Keith Moore
moore at cs.utk.edu
Tue Jan 6 05:40:26 CET 2004
> If you wish to raise some of these commments as IETF Last Call
> comments, I think you'll have to take the responsibility for raising
> these issues at IETF last call yourself.
I thought that is what I was requesting. And we do have a tradition of
considering last call comments even if they are late.
> In a group that is so much concerned with process or the lack of it,
> the least we can do is to try to follow what process we have.
Well, this group certainly didn't make much of a point of following
process. The document doesn't represent consensus of the WG; rather it
represents some people's opinions about the problems with this
organization while ignoring others' opinions. So for the WG chairs to
claim that they only needed to consider last call comments for which
there was consensus seems a bit odd - apparently they thought they
needed consensus for last call comments but not for the actual content
of the document.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list