IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission
todd glassey
todd.glassey at worldnet.att.net
Thu Oct 23 17:13:21 CEST 2003
Harald - perhaps the problem is that the IETF's preferences are the issue.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald at alvestrand.no>
To: <erosen at cisco.com>
Cc: <problem-statement at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission
>
>
> --On 23. oktober 2003 09:51 -0400 Eric Rosen <erosen at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Harald> I don't think that it's necessary for the IETF mission to
> > be Harald> consistent with every decision we've taken in the past.
> >
> > If your "mission statement" is inconsistent with MANY of the decisions
> > that have been taken in the past, then you should admit that you are
> > trying to change the IETF's mission to suit your own preferences,
> > rather than trying to codify any existing practice.
>
> True. But I don't want to close out the option of admitting that adopting
> TRADE, FORCES, OPES or SPEECHSC was a mistake, or that we shouldn't have
> kicked HTML work out of the IETF and into the World Wide Web Consortium,
if
> that's what the community thinks.
> All of these were debated at the time the decisions were made. It would be
> a surprise if we, using 20/20 hindsight, were to conclude that we did the
> right thing every time.
>
> Note: If I was trying to change the IETF's mission to suit my own
> preferences, this discussion would be shorter. I'm trying to change the
> IETF's mission to suit the *IETF*'s preferences.
>
> Harald
>
>
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list