Problems vs Social Dynamics (Re: IESG proposed statement on
theIETF mission)
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Mon Oct 20 11:58:45 CEST 2003
--On 16. oktober 2003 07:53 -0500 Spencer Dawkins <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>
wrote:
> ... and, if we don't already have a problem statement, that's a
> problem, too ...
>
> Seriously, Brian wasn't very excited about an IESG-only/non-IESG+IAB
> mission statement, and I take his point. I have to say that I'm still
> wondering what more than two or three people on IESG think of the
> current problem statement draft, too.
>
> The contributions from IESG members have been very helpful. In the
> absence of a Process specification with WG oomph behind it, we seem to
> be (per the last Plenary) looking expectantly at the IESG as a group
> to respond to the problem statement draft. At least, that was my
> take - did I get it wrong?
My take too. And we're working on it - the task was harder than I'd
anticipated.
>
> Any plans to respond at plenary time?
Yes. And having stuff visible before that.
Harald
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list