Problems vs Social Dynamics (Re: IESG proposed statement on theIETF mission)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand harald at alvestrand.no
Mon Oct 20 11:58:45 CEST 2003



--On 16. oktober 2003 07:53 -0500 Spencer Dawkins <spencer at mcsr-labs.org> 
wrote:

> ... and, if we don't already have a problem statement, that's a
> problem, too ...
>
> Seriously, Brian wasn't very excited about an IESG-only/non-IESG+IAB
> mission statement, and I take his point. I have to say that I'm still
> wondering what more than two or three people on IESG think of the
> current problem statement draft, too.
>
> The contributions from IESG members have been very helpful. In the
> absence of a Process specification with WG oomph behind it, we seem to
> be (per the last Plenary) looking expectantly at the IESG as a group
> to respond to the problem statement draft. At least, that was my
> take - did I get it wrong?

My take too. And we're working on it - the task was harder than I'd 
anticipated.
>
> Any plans to respond at plenary time?

Yes. And having stuff visible before that.

             Harald







More information about the Problem-statement mailing list