An overview of where the IETF change process is currently at
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Thu Oct 2 01:34:40 CEST 2003
On torsdag, okt 2, 2003, at 00:18 Asia/Seoul, James Kempf wrote:
> Avri,
>
> You've fairly clearly articulated how you want to see community
> participants
> chosen, but you've suggested nothing about how I* participants might be
> chosen. Pursuing the analogy with NomCom, do you feel that the I*
> participants should be chosen and should view their roles as similar
> to the
> I* NomCom representatives? Or do you feel that they should be more
> active
> participants?
>
> jak
>
>
I tend to think of them as full and equal participants though they also
would represent their respective group's interests. in terms of
picking them, i think that would best be left to the bodies they are
members of.
a.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list