An overview of where the IETF change process is currently at

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Thu Oct 2 01:34:40 CEST 2003


On torsdag, okt 2, 2003, at 00:18 Asia/Seoul, James Kempf wrote:

> Avri,
>
> You've fairly clearly articulated how you want to see community 
> participants
> chosen, but you've suggested nothing about how I* participants might be
> chosen. Pursuing the analogy with NomCom, do you feel that the I*
> participants should be chosen and should view their roles as similar 
> to the
> I* NomCom representatives? Or do you feel that they should be more 
> active
> participants?
>
>             jak
>
>

I tend to think of them as full and equal participants though they also 
would represent their respective group's interests.  in terms of 
picking them, i think that would best be left to the bodies they are 
members of.

a.



More information about the Problem-statement mailing list