OPEN ISSUE: Quality Process WG Charter

Margaret Wasserman mrw at windriver.com
Thu May 29 10:11:17 CEST 2003


I don't believe that adding extra review at the end of
the WG process will improve anything...

We need to establish some quality processes to be used
during WG document production that will include (among
other things) appropriately scoped reviews of documents
at specific milestones.  So, I don't see these two
concepts (WG processes and review processes) as
separable.

Margaret


At 09:04 AM 5/29/2003 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > So, do we have consensus to start the near-term WG to
> > improve the WG quality processes and IETF review
> > processes?
>
>I fear that if we do this, the WG will spend too much time on review processes
>and not enough time on WG operation.  But I'm not sure what to do about it:
>both subjects need attention, and if we created two separate WGs then the one
>working on extra-WG review might attract a lot more interest than the one
>working on WG operation.




More information about the Problem-statement mailing list