Charters, "normal process" versus ISOC, etc. (was: Re
Brian E Carpenter
brian at hursley.ibm.com
Fri May 23 16:51:09 CEST 2003
James Kempf wrote:
>
> > Given that people who were there at the time have indicated that
> most
> > of these problems have existed in the IETF for at least 10 years,
> how
> > could you reasonably claim that any IAB/IESG member who has served
> in the
> > last ten years is any less culpable than current IAB/IESG members?
> >
>
> First off, I don't believe any of the current IAB/IESG members are in
> any sense "culpable".
Anyway, even if the old-timers are (and feel) culpable, why does
that disqualify them? Repairing one's past mistakes is supposed to be
a virtue.
I find this whole line of discussion worrying. If applied recursively,
it contaminates everyone on this mailing list; if we weren't part of the
problem, we wouldn't be here.
Brian
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list