Update
Brian E Carpenter
brian at hursley.ibm.com
Fri May 23 15:41:17 CEST 2003
Melinda Shore wrote:
>
> > Melinda, I think that a large fraction of the notes I've posted
> > recently have contained comments of the nature of "this appears
> > to be an important problem/issue and it appears to not be
> > reflected in the current version of the problem description
> > document".
>
> Sorry, should have been clearer. We're certainly tracking
> discussion of new problems as they crop up on the mailing
> list and those are being distilled into the new revision of
> the document. Those discussions are about what's not in the
> document. We haven't had much discussion of what *is* in
> the document, however, and in the interest of moving the
> document along towards WG last call we need to make sure
> that the it's getting that kind of review.
Related to that, I'm a little sad to see the former Appendix
(i.e. the long list of specific problems) consigned to the
archive. There may be a case for a second document that is in
fact the long list, including any new ones that don't make it
into the root causes document.
Brian
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list