OPEN ISSUE: Appeals Path

[Melinda Shore]

The issue raised was this:

>- [The ISOC-driven] approach does not require an explicit appeals
>   process, because an IETF Plenary is used as the basis for approval,
>   and it is that body from which the IETF draws its authority.
>   [OPEN ISSUE: Do we have consensus that a defined appeals
>   process is not required for this option?]

We were unable to reach consensus on this (yet), but since
the ISOC-driven approach has been rejected by the WG, this
question is academic.

Melinda