Solutions WG chair selection (was: Re: OPEN ISSUE: WG Chair Selection)

[Spencer Dawkins]

Hi, Dave,

My apologies for appearing to pronounce convergence,
(at least I never used the word "consensus"). My attention
was mostly focused on an "Open Issue" from process-00,
and I was trying to say "... although some of us would like for
the Solutions WG chair selection to be done differently". It
wasn't my intention to try to steer the conversation on the
Solutions WG chair selection.

Poor choice of words. I now return you to the capable hands
of Melinda and Avri!

Dear All,

I'd still like to hear comments on whether the way we select
working group chairs IN GENERAL is a "problem". This was
a question in section 4.5 of the current version of the process draft, 
and the editorial team was looking for input - hence Margaret's
posting.

I tweaked the subject line, so we can start trying to tell the 
two threads apart when we look back...

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc at dcrocker.net>
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>
Cc: <problem-statement at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: OPEN ISSUE: WG Chair Selection


> Spencer,
> 
> SD> I believe that this thread was actually about the general
> SD> process of selecting a chair for any WG, not about the
> SD> mechanisms we're discussing for choosing leadership
> SD> for the Solutions WG (we seem to be converging on a
> 
> oh.
> 
> 
> SD> "less change is better than more change" for the Solutions
> SD> AD and WG chair(s),
> 
> not if it establishes an inherent conflict of interest we aren't.
> 
> 
> 
> d/
> --
>  Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
>  Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>
>