OPEN ISSUE: Appeals Path

[Bound, Jim]

Yep I knew that about tech appeals.  Suggesting we discuss if we want
ISOC also for tech appeals but did not directly in the mail.  Sorry.
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas at netcore.fi] 
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: Margaret Wasserman
> Cc: Bound, Jim; Dave Crocker; problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: OPEN ISSUE: Appeals Path
> 
> 
> On Sat, 17 May 2003, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> > >WG Chair
> > >IESG
> > >IAB
> > >ISOC
> > >
> > >This is standard open door policy in any company I know of too.
> > 
> > Yes, and this also matches the standard appeals process for IETF WG 
> > activities.
> 
> "IETF WG activities" is ambiguous.  The path holds for 
> process appeals, 
> but for technical appeals, the IAB is the highest you can go.
> 
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
> 
>