My thoughts about the problems of the IETF
Spencer Dawkins
spencer_dawkins at yahoo.com
Fri May 2 07:21:14 CEST 2003
Dear Eric,
Ummm, I can't say this is an unrealistically dark view of the
IESG, but I CAN say it's a very dark view. If it's realistic,
aren't we already dead?
(Or are you saying we're already dead, and just don't know it?)
Spencer
--- Eric Rosen <erosen at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> > two ways that outside reviewers might help reduce workload:
>
> > 1. require all documents to have N favorable outside
> reviews, each
> > from an IESG-appointed reviewer pool, before going to IESG
> review
>
> > 2. provide that any document which has more than Z
> unfavorable
> > reviews from the reviewer pool need not be considered by
> IESG
>
> This has the obvious problem that the IESG could stack the
> pool of reviewers
> so as to achieve any goal they want, and there would
> be even less
> accountability than there is today.
>
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list