WG Chairs training (Re: modest suggestion for how to proceed)

[Pekka Savola]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >Transparency, here too, might be nice.
> >
> >(Or maybe not if you just want to replace "evil IESG" with "evil WG
> >chairs" and remove a scalability problem ;-).
> 
> Ahhh... My secret plot has been uncovered.  :-).
> 
> Seriously, what parts of the WG chairs training efforts should be
> more transparent?
> 
> The WG chairs web site is available on the IETF web site at:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/IESG/wgchairs.html

Oh, I must have missed the link.  This seems sufficient. :-)
 
> I have also limited (intentionally) the general discussions of
> WG chairs training to WG/BOF chairs and IESG members, because I think
> that these are the right people to discuss this topic.  I would like
> to provide appropriate transparency for these discussions, but I'd
> also like to keep the discussions themselves constrained to WG/BOF
> chairs and IESG members.  Is there a good way to do that?  Would
> it would to include a pointer to the wgchairs-training mailing list
> archives on the (publicly accessible) WG chairs web site?

There should be a pointer already.  One thing I find nice is a way to look 
at the archives in threaded form on the web instead of ftp'd mailboxes, 
but that's no big deal.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings