Statistics (RE: The "late surprise" problem)

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand]

as it happens, I have some numbers for the period between Atlanta and San 
Francisco.....

>   IETF Activity since last IETF Meeting (Atlanta)
>
>
> 428	New I-Ds	     (71 of which were updated, some (14) more than once)
> 754	I-Ds were updated     (Some more than once)
> 44	I-Ds Last Called
> 75	I-Ds approved for publication
>
> In the final 4 weeks before meeting
>
> 238	New I-Ds were received	56%	 (of total newbies since last meeting
> 513	I-Ds were updated	68%	 (of total updated since last meeting)
>
> 	Week 1	90	12%
> 	Week 2	82	11%	 (Initial cutoff)
> 	Week 3	194	26%	 (ID Cutoff)
> 	Week 4	385	51%



--On 22. mars 2003 09:15 -0600 Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com wrote:

> Another thing that would help in determining the size of the SIRs
> group is to obtain some stats on the number of WG LCs and IETF LCs
> issued in a year. That way the suggested size of 100 can be reviewed
> and scoped for sufficiency.