appeal mechanisms was Re: Ombuds-process

Keith Moore moore at cs.utk.edu
Sun Jun 29 01:47:08 CEST 2003


On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:09:49 +0900
avri <avri at apocalypse.org> wrote:

] i am personally fine with the statement of the problem as:
] 
] When an individual thinks that the process has produced a
] result that is harmful to the Internet or thinks that IETF processes
] have not been adhered to, there is no mechanism to aid that
] individual in seeking to change that result.
] 
] i think this take your comments into account.   does it?

mostly.  but is it really the case that the appeals process doesn't
serve this purpose?  I would claim that something that is harmful
to the Internet is a technical error, and of course not adhering to
process is a process error, either of which can be appealed under
our current rules.


More information about the Problem-statement mailing list