The need for smaller protocol specifications
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Wed Jun 11 13:23:53 CEST 2003
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >>>>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik F=E4ltstr=F6m?= writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks for your note - I appreciate it.
Also totally agree; very well written note, and one I agree with :-).
> Patrik> But, I definitely think we need to talk more carefully about
> Patrik> where the review is done, and how we make sure it is done.
>
> Serious document reviews take time (a) for the review itself plus (b)
> for the followup discussions (and in my experience b >> a). The only
> reward for such a time investment is (perhaps) being mentioned in the
> acknowledgements section.
>
> To achieve more and better reviews, we simply have to make it more
> attractive for people to spend their time on serious reviews.
I agree. My experience is that even if you very detailed reviews, people
don't always acknowledge you. Many don't even have the acknowledgements
sections in the drafts.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list