Trusting the IESG to manage the reform process(was:Re:DoingtheRight Things?)

[Bound, Jim]

I like the list but we do have quality documents and most of them are
quality.

I guess I want to step back.  

What is not a quality document?  WHich RFC?  I assume we are not talking
about IDs?

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: john.loughney at nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney at nokia.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:12 AM
> To: randy at psg.com
> Cc: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: Trusting the IESG to manage the reform 
> process(was:Re:DoingtheRight Things?)
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Cutting out the parts of the discussion not relevant to my view:
> 
> > if we come to agreement that producing quality and scaling are two 
> > core problems, then i think there is some organizational and 
> > management experience from within the computer industry and outside 
> > from which we can draw some ideas on quality management etc.  but i 
> > don't think we've reached consensus that these are the issues yet.
> 
> If it matters, I believe two major core problems are 
> 
> 	1) producing quality documents 
> 	2) solving current scaling problems
> 
> and to add a third:
> 
> 	3) producing timely documents (this has relations to 1 & 2).
> 
> Anyhow, perhaps a reasonable way forward would be to see if 
> we can gain consensus on at least 2 or 3 (not limited to the one's 
> I've listed) core problems & start to move forward on them; 
> while still examining other problems.
> 
> John
>