Staying on Track (Re: Documenting pilots (RE:
pausableexplanation for the Document Series))
Bound, Jim
Jim.Bound at hp.com
Sun Jun 8 00:12:25 CEST 2003
I think what is documented and accurate and now just needs refinement.
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melinda Shore [mailto:mshore at cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:25 AM
> To: Margaret Wasserman
> Cc: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: Staying on Track (Re: Documenting pilots (RE:
> pausableexplanation for the Document Series))
>
>
> > Are people happy enough with those documents that we're
> > ready to publish them and move on? If so, let's do
> > that. If not, please send feedback on the documents to
> > this list, and keep solutions discussions on the solutions mailing
> > list.
>
> I'm also very concerned about keeping the documents moving
> forward, but I do think that the notion of what we need to do
> about short-term solution efforts that would be hampered by
> the overhead associated with working group creation do need
> to be addressed and I think some interesting ideas have been
> popping out of the discussion.
>
> One of the problems with the discussion, however, is that we
> still don't have a way to accommodate ad-hoc, short-lived,
> individual voluntary, or what-have-you efforts, and that does
> need to be dealt with. Personally (i.e. not as chair) I'm
> not crazy about things like what's going on with the SIRS
> proposal (going off and collecting volunteers without real
> agreement from the cohort that this is a good thing to
> do) because it feels pre-emptive and unco-operative, but on
> the other hand given our decision-making structure I'm not
> sure what the alternatives are if anything is going to
> happen in real time. If anybody has wisdom about how to do
> short-term efforts within the IETF, this would be an
> excellent time to discuss it.
>
> Melinda
>
>
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list