WG Quality Processes WG

Spencer Dawkins spencer at mcsr-labs.org
Tue Jun 3 08:21:40 CEST 2003

Just so I'm clearer than previously, this was not a suggestion
to feed the IESG to the pigs. What I was trying to say was,
it looks like the bulk of this work will be small chunks of 
evolution, not big chunks of revolution, based on input on
this list so far, so we need to be organizing to do small chunks
of work effectively.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <john.loughney at nokia.com>
To: <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>; <problem-statement at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:39 PM
Subject: RE: WG Quality Processes WG

Hi Spencer,

> We had already started a discussion this morning about
> how we organize to do "small chunks of work". It seems
> to me that we are headed toward small process changes,
> as opposed to "feed the IESG to pigs and start over",
> so the "small chunks of work" discussion seems applicable
> to process work as well.

In a way, does it matter?  Even if we feed the IESG to the 
pigs, there are still a lot of small things that need to
be fixed.  What is needed is for people to bite off part
of the problem and start working on it.  Of course, having
some co-ordination so there isn't a mad-stampede to the


More information about the Problem-statement mailing list