WG Quality Processes WG
jari.arkko at piuha.net
Tue Jun 3 08:05:43 CEST 2003
john.loughney at nokia.com wrote:
> Hi Spencer,
>>We had already started a discussion this morning about
>>how we organize to do "small chunks of work". It seems
>>to me that we are headed toward small process changes,
>>as opposed to "feed the IESG to pigs and start over",
>>so the "small chunks of work" discussion seems applicable
>>to process work as well.
> In a way, does it matter? Even if we feed the IESG to the
> pigs, there are still a lot of small things that need to
> be fixed. What is needed is for people to bite off part
> of the problem and start working on it.
I agree with John here. This group seems a bit stuck in
its (very IETF-like) approach of trying to understand
the whole picture completely and agreeing on everything
before being able to take the first step.
P.S. I don't believe we should feed the IESG to the pigs,
or anyone else for that matter.
More information about the Problem-statement