Trusting the IESG to manage the reform process (was: Re: Doing
the Right Things?)
john.loughney at nokia.com
john.loughney at nokia.com
Tue Jun 3 07:23:20 CEST 2003
Hi John,
On second thought, no detailed comments, but an overall
comment. I agree we should get some people to suggest
fixes and more forward on it. There should be some
oversight of this work - to help focus it, call early
consensus and try to avoid circular email discussions.
I think what is needed is some forward momentum, something
very much lacking at the moment.
br,
John L
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext John C Klensin [mailto:john-ietf at jck.com]
> Sent: 02 June, 2003 22:30
> To: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Trusting the IESG to manage the reform process (was:
> Re: Doing
> the Right Things?)
>
>
> Summary: If we can't trust the current IESG for reform-process
> management, we are in deep trouble. If we are in that much
> trouble, we should be postponing the little issues because we
> need to be looking at very fundamental change, starting with
> discarding the nomcom process and starting over on our selection
> processes. I don't believe that is that case, and don't
> believe that the view that it is the case is generally held in
> the community, but it is probably time to face the question.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list