Cutting through the accumulating sludge (was: Re: Doing the
Right Things? and/or WG Quality Processes WG)
john.loughney at nokia.com
john.loughney at nokia.com
Tue Jun 3 07:18:48 CEST 2003
Hi John,
> For those who don't like reading my long notes -- at least
> before they know what they have to say -- this note suggests
> that we bypass WGs and even BOFs for most of this work and adopt
> a model that uses
>
> * proposal-> affirmative decision -> implementation ->
> subsequent review and write up -> Last Call and BCP if needed
>
> and
>
> * proposal -> negative decision -> discussion/ debate/
> serious write up -> Last Call
>
> instead of pretending the tuning suggestions about WG process
> are technical standards. It explains why I think that is
> appropriate, probably necessary, and The Right Thing to Do.
That sounds like a reasonable way forward, but there are the boring
details of where to feed the proposals, get the decision, do
the review, who should take the lead, etc. I think this is
what we need to decide to do in the next week or two.
Some detailed comments in following mails.
John L.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list