WG Quality Processes WG
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Mon Jun 2 16:03:35 CEST 2003
the mechanical things can be done, with just a Small Matter of
the trick is to figure out which ones actually help....
--On mandag, juni 02, 2003 15:45:38 +0300 john.loughney at nokia.com wrote:
> It would be great, for example, if
> a) WGs that were more than 6 months late on one of their deliverables
> where sent montly reminders of the fact until either the deliverable
> was completed or charter was updated.
currently we're going for bimonthly reminders to chairs on all overdue
I'm not sure how much that helps in the long run, but it's a start...
> b) If the Draft-tracker had a time out, so that any document sitting in
> a certain state for too long (say 4 months) generated a mail to the
> mailing list, document editor(s)/author(s), sheparding AD about the
well.... state "RFC Published" and "dead" are quite OK for a document to
stay in, of course; "AD is watching" is doubtful (could change if/when the
system is extended to do WG tracking) - otherwise, it would seem to make
> c) if the draft-tracker would send mail to a WG, author(s)/editor(s)
> everytime a document changed state
Already on the wishlist. I don't think the whole WG wants *all* the state
changes, so the WG chairs could act as a filter.....
More information about the Problem-statement