[Fwd: Re: rough consensus (was Re: "trouble maker")]
Brian E Carpenter
brian at hursley.ibm.com
Wed Jul 16 16:01:09 CEST 2003
Scott W Brim wrote:
>
> I like the idea that Chairs should document why they declared consensus
> (or the lack of it).
Agreed. But another thing that may be going on is Chairs making consensus
calls too late.
If you ask a WG to accept a draft that's been in development for a year
and the WG says no, you asked the question too late. It's not a
problem with the consensus process, but with the decision tree.
Brian
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list