Robert's Rules (Re: ADs who are also WG chairs)
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Fri Jul 4 18:44:48 CEST 2003
--On fredag, juli 04, 2003 08:17:20 -0700 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip"
<pbaker at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> Step three - Roberts rules of order.
>
serious question:
do you have an example of a version of Robert's rules of order that has
successfully been applied to mailing lists?
RR has a number of concepts that are hard to apply to a mailing list -
recognition of speakers by the chair, expulsion from the room of disorderly
members, voting in real time on points of procedure, for instance. I'd be
interested in hearing of examples of successful adaptations.
I've been involved in one or two other attempts to call on Robert's rules
when mailing lists were part of the context, and they usually petered into
nothing when people started following the pointers and actually *reading*
the Robert's Rules books - there are just so many concepts that need
adaption. It may be possible, may even be very useful - but it certainly
isn't obvious.
RR has sometimes been described as "how to make decisions in an orderly
fashion with participants who don't trust each other one bit". We might
need that model at times.
Harald
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list