Complex Problems
john.loughney at nokia.com
john.loughney at nokia.com
Fri Jan 10 02:13:59 CET 2003
Hi Randy,
> > I've read them all and actually commented on most of them ... that is
> > not my point. My point is that I wonder if there is some general
> > malaise in the IETF if the community is not interested in discussing
> > architectural issues now.
>
> as a co-author of 3439 (which was not really intended as an update
> to 1958), i for one am certainly not disinterested in discussing
> architectural issues. and i find many folk willing to do so.
That is a good thing. I was a bit worried by Brian's mail, implying
the community was not interested in talking about architectural issues.
> one problem is that these are not simple issues. this is not a
> simple space. and they often do not have 'solutions', but rather
> provide guidance and clues. and, when that guidance does not fit
> well with someone's plan or product, i guess it may indeed seem as
> if they do not want to discuss architecture.
That makes much sense as well. I guess that might lead to the suggestion
that architectural discussions / advice are best done as early as possible
- it becomes much more difficult to re-architect things at the IESG
review stage - but you know that.
John
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list