john.loughney at nokia.com john.loughney at nokia.com
Tue Jan 7 09:08:21 CET 2003


In the following document,


It is stated:

4.3 IESG review procedures

   The IESG review procedure is defined by the IESG.

   At the time of this writing, the procedure consists of:

   o  An initial review by the responsible AD, assisted by whatever
      reviewers the AD wants to bring to bear

   o  Once the responsible AD is satisfied that the document is worth
      sponsoring, a review by the entire IESG

   o  If the IESG has questions or comments, the responsible AD takes
      the token to resolve these with the authors or WG responsible
      before taking the (possibly revised) document back to the IESG for

It might be useful to discuss this in a bit more detail, especially with
regards what 'review' means (does the IESG review grammer, for example).
Also, some disucssion is needed to what the relation between IESG
review and what the RFC editor review is.


More information about the Problem-statement mailing list