Hard problems [Re: Standards]

[Keith Moore]

> My own feeling is that working groups could be chartered to do architecture,
> then rechartered to do the actual protocol, and that the architecture could be
> subject to review to make sure it is consistent with the rest of the Internet
> architecture on a detail level. I think this would be more likely to fit with
> IETF's working style.

when the problem is that WGs are too narrowly-focused, having an architecture
WG with the same scope as the protocol WG won't help.