A 100.000 foot perspective on "what is the problem"

[James Kempf]

> i.e. architecture, engineering balance, ... are not things that can
> be pronounced from the mountain top (though tablets may be of help
> (especially if taken twice daily:-)), but need to be generated by
> and absorbed by our culture and consciousnesses (w?).  do we need
> to do a better job of this?  can it be done more easily and/or more
> quickly, and/or more effectively?
>

Yes, exactly! The earlier we get these kinds of considerations injected into the
process, the less likely they are to be viewed as disruptive to what market
participants want.

            jak