Killing old/slow groups - transition thinking

Marshall Rose mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:35:53 -0800


> So, I think to support your claim that the IESG is not saying no
> enough you need to look at specific instances where you believe the
> IESG should have said no and didn't.  I realize that I'm directly
> asking you to second-guess the IESG.  But you seem to be saying that
> the IESG should be saying no more.  I don't know how to evaluate
> whether that is true without looking at specific instances and
> considering all the factors that could have gone into the
> decisions--not just the factor of timeliness of progress.

or, one could simply start with harald's stats on the number of wgs with grossly
overdue milestones and come to a reasonable conclusion about whether "no" gets
said often enough...

/mtr