Killing old/slow groups - transition thinking
Marshall Rose
mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:35:53 -0800
> So, I think to support your claim that the IESG is not saying no
> enough you need to look at specific instances where you believe the
> IESG should have said no and didn't. I realize that I'm directly
> asking you to second-guess the IESG. But you seem to be saying that
> the IESG should be saying no more. I don't know how to evaluate
> whether that is true without looking at specific instances and
> considering all the factors that could have gone into the
> decisions--not just the factor of timeliness of progress.
or, one could simply start with harald's stats on the number of wgs with grossly
overdue milestones and come to a reasonable conclusion about whether "no" gets
said often enough...
/mtr