[Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired

[William Allen Simpson]

John C Klensin wrote:

>Then these need the "bad"  designation, not just the "not really
>interesting any more" one.  And that, presumably, requires a
>"1828/1829 considered harmful" document, or at least a paragraph
>and a place to put it.
>  
>
Well, gosh and golly gee, I wrote an "ISAKMP considered harmful" about
6 years ago, and the IESG -- for the first time in its history --
ordered it removed from the internet-drafts repository (saying the
IETF wouldn't publish anything critical of the IETF process).

It was published as a Usenix ";login:" feature article instead....

I suspect Bob and I could have something in days!

-- 
William Allen Simpson
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32