[Old-standards] Re: RFC1269 - [was: RE: [newtrk] List of Old
Standards to be retired]
Eliot Lear
lear at cisco.com
Thu Dec 16 17:06:26 CET 2004
Bert,
I'll remove it from the list with the expectation that the new MIB will
obsolete the old one. However, I note that is currently not stated in
the header of the draft.
Eliot
Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> W.r.t.
>
>>>>RFC1269 Definitions of Managed Objects for the Border Gateway
>>>> Protocol: Version 3
>>>
>>>
>>>Why would this be cruft? The BGP4 MIB was just recently approved...
>>
>>Good thing too. Take a good look at 1269. I don't think it would pass
>>a MIB compiler test today. If you approved the BGP4-MIB,
>>ought not that have obsoleted this guy?
>>
>
> The new doc (in IESG evaluation status) is
>
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib-15.txt
>
> And its abstract says it all:
>
> Abstract
>
> This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
> for use with network management protocols in the Internet community
> In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the
> Border Gateway Protocol Version 4 or lower.
>
> The origin of this memo is from RFC 1269 "Definitions of Managed
> Objects for the Border Gateway Protocol (Version 3)", which was
> updated to support BGP-4 in RFC 1657. This memo fixes errors
> introduced when the MIB module was converted to use the SMIv2
> language. This memo also updates references to the current SNMP
> framework documents.
>
> This memo is intended to document deployed implementations of this
> MIB module in a historical context, provide clarifications of some
> items and also note errors where the MIB module fails to fully
> represent the BGP protocol. Work is currently in progress to replace
> this MIB module with a new one representing the current state of the
> BGP protocol and its extensions.
>
> This document obsoletes RFC 1269 and RFC 1657.
>
> Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Please forward comments to
> idr at ietf.org.
>
>
> So 1269 will soon be made OBSOLETED
>
> I will look at other MIB related documents next week.
>
> Bert
>
>
More information about the Old-standards
mailing list