[Old-standards] Triggered RIP
W. Mark Townsley
townsley at cisco.com
Thu Dec 9 23:40:30 CET 2004
Concerning:
RFC1582 Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits
There seems to be a follow-on version, RFC 2091, though there is no formal
linkage between the two in the rfc-index:
1582 Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits G. Meyer [ February 1994 ]
(TXT = 63271 bytes)
2091 Triggered Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits G. Meyer, S. Sherry
[ January 1997 ] (TXT = 44835 bytes)
Should 2091 obsolete 1582? What shall we do with 2091?
As an aside, a recent DSL-Forum document makes normative reference to RFC 2091
as one recommended method of propogating routes to a DSL CPE device.
- Mark
More information about the Old-standards
mailing list