[Old-standards] Triggered RIP

W. Mark Townsley townsley at cisco.com
Thu Dec 9 23:40:30 CET 2004


Concerning:

RFC1582       Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits

There seems to be a follow-on version, RFC 2091, though there is no formal
linkage between the two in the rfc-index:

1582 	Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits G. Meyer [ February 1994 ]
(TXT = 63271 bytes)

2091 	Triggered Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits G. Meyer, S. Sherry 
[ January 1997 ] (TXT = 44835 bytes)

Should 2091 obsolete 1582? What shall we do with 2091?

As an aside, a recent DSL-Forum document makes normative reference to RFC 2091 
as one recommended method of propogating routes to a DSL CPE device.

- Mark






More information about the Old-standards mailing list