Review requested for MusicXML media type proposals

[Mark Baker]

On 6/8/07, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi at gmx.net> wrote:
> The point is that you said the proposal needs to be changed and that
> .xml is not suitable for the proposed type. This is not backed by RFC
> 4288, RFC 3023, or by consensus on the ietf-types list.

I pointed out that at least one other media type registration switched
from ".xml" to a media type specific file extension.  I think that
demonstrates that it has been the concensus position of the list in
the past.  On what basis do you claim that it is not?

Mark.