Media Type review request for application/dialog-info+xml

[Bjoern Hoehrmann]

* Martin Duerst wrote:
>At 04:30 05/01/25, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> >* Allison Mankin wrote:
> >>The Transport Area requests a Media Type review for the proposed
> >>new type application/dialog-info+xml, intended for the IETF tree, and specified
> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-05.txt
> >>(Section 8.1).
> >
> >Why does it list .xml as file extension?
>
>Is there anything wrong with using a .xml extension? If yes, what?

Well, e.g. RFC 3236 states:

[...]
  It is not recommended that the ".xml" extension (defined in
  [XMLMIME]) be used, as web servers may be configured to
  distribute such content as type "text/xml" or
  "application/xml".  [XMLMIME] discusses the unreliability of
  this approach in section 3.  Of course, should the author
  desire this behaviour, then the ".xml" extension can be used.
[...]
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/