CORRECTION: Please review ietf-draft of SMIL media-type registration
Philipp Hoschka
ph at w3.org
Tue Aug 27 16:02:07 CEST 2002
Kari,
good catches !
See inline for more
Kari Pihkala wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed some inconsistencies with the SMIL namespaces in the
> draft. In section 4:
>
> All SMIL 2.0 files must also include a declaration of the SMIL 2.0
> namespace. This should appear shortly after the string "<smil", and
> should read 'xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/PR/Language"'.
Fixed this to use
http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/Language
as namespace.
> However, a different namespace in the end of section 5:
>
> An example use of this parameter as part of a HTTP GET transaction
> would be:
>
> Accept: application/smil+xml;
> profile="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/REC/HostLanguage"
Removed the REC part.
The namespace should be different, I think, since this is the way
that a client informs a server that it supports SMIL basic.
I'm not sure that people actually use the following URI to
identify SMIL basic, however
http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/REC/HostLanguage
or that anyone uses the "accept" header at all - I'll send a
seperate message to the www-smil list on that.
> Also, either of these namespaces match the one in SMIL 2.0 spec
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil20-20010807/smil20-profile.html):
> 13.3.2 SMIL 2.0 Language Conformance
>
> 5. A document must declare a default namespace for its elements with an
> xmlns attribute on the smil root element with its identifier URI:
> <smil xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/Language">
> ...
> </smil>
>
> You may want to check these...
>
> - Kari
...
More information about the Ietf-types
mailing list